<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Little Bit Closed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ingres.com/emmamcgrattan/2008/04/16/a-little-bit-closed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ingres.com/emmamcgrattan/2008/04/16/a-little-bit-closed/</link>
	<description>The View From 25B</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ingres.com/emmamcgrattan/2008/04/16/a-little-bit-closed/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ingres.com/emmamcgrattan/?p=42#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>Hi Emma,

I'll give you a chance to prove your words ;-P

#0: requesting an trac account.

#1: let's cleanup the buildsystem !

* requiring _source_ of external packages (-&#62;xercesc) is crap. the whole way of importing xerces, too. 
-&#62; xerces should provide an proper .pc file and ingres' build just query on it.
-&#62; absolute library filenames (of external libs) should *never* be used.

* the lack of an automatic (non-interactive!) sequential build process is really, really bad for packagers. 

* the whole installation process is a nightmare !

As long as vital issues like a clean build and installation process aren't fixed yet, I really doubt Ingres will reach an wide usage in OSS world :(

Perhaps it's wise to spend a few more resources on that instead of burning time w/ "certifying" java-abusing crap from people who don't have the slightest idea of relational algebrabra ;-P


cu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Emma,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give you a chance to prove your words ;-P</p>
<p>#0: requesting an trac account.</p>
<p>#1: let&#8217;s cleanup the buildsystem !</p>
<p>* requiring _source_ of external packages (-&gt;xercesc) is crap. the whole way of importing xerces, too.<br />
-&gt; xerces should provide an proper .pc file and ingres&#8217; build just query on it.<br />
-&gt; absolute library filenames (of external libs) should *never* be used.</p>
<p>* the lack of an automatic (non-interactive!) sequential build process is really, really bad for packagers. </p>
<p>* the whole installation process is a nightmare !</p>
<p>As long as vital issues like a clean build and installation process aren&#8217;t fixed yet, I really doubt Ingres will reach an wide usage in OSS world <img src='http://blogs.ingres.com/emmamcgrattan/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s wise to spend a few more resources on that instead of burning time w/ &#8220;certifying&#8221; java-abusing crap from people who don&#8217;t have the slightest idea of relational algebrabra ;-P</p>
<p>cu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rachwalski</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ingres.com/emmamcgrattan/2008/04/16/a-little-bit-closed/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rachwalski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ingres.com/emmamcgrattan/?p=42#comment-22</guid>
		<description>You're observation regarding the importance of truly doing development in the open is one that Sun does seem to have missed.

In response to a mailing list missive from Sun's John Plocer, http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2008-March/005174.html, IBM's Ted Ts'o recently picked up on the same issue present in the Open Solaris community Sun was trying to foster:

http://thunk.org/tytso/blog/2008/04/19/what-sun-was-trying-to-do-with-open-solaris/

Ted later elaborated on distinctions between different open source, musing on the differences between "organic" and "non-organic" open source projects.  Sun's Open Solaris would be an example of the latter, attempting to transition from a project open in name only to one genuinely open with active community involvement.  

Sadly, they seem to have stumbled with respect to successfully engaging with the development community and the result has been that Open Solaris has attracted limited amount of developer interest in participating in the Open Solaris project after three years.

Given the community contributor encouragement in the above post, Ingress seems to be making a similar attempt at moving from a non-organic open source project to an organic one.  I applaud your efforts in this regard, but would caution you to learn from Sun's MySQL and Open Solaris examples.  Communities are difficult to create and require nurturing.  Perusing the Ingres issue tracking, wiki, and source control systems, it is clear that the right steps are being made but that Ingress too has quite a ways to go.

In that, I wish you and your talented team the best of luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re observation regarding the importance of truly doing development in the open is one that Sun does seem to have missed.</p>
<p>In response to a mailing list missive from Sun&#8217;s John Plocer, <a href="http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2008-March/005174.html" rel="nofollow">http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2008-March/005174.html</a>, IBM&#8217;s Ted Ts&#8217;o recently picked up on the same issue present in the Open Solaris community Sun was trying to foster:</p>
<p><a href="http://thunk.org/tytso/blog/2008/04/19/what-sun-was-trying-to-do-with-open-solaris/" rel="nofollow">http://thunk.org/tytso/blog/2008/04/19/what-sun-was-trying-to-do-with-open-solaris/</a></p>
<p>Ted later elaborated on distinctions between different open source, musing on the differences between &#8220;organic&#8221; and &#8220;non-organic&#8221; open source projects.  Sun&#8217;s Open Solaris would be an example of the latter, attempting to transition from a project open in name only to one genuinely open with active community involvement.  </p>
<p>Sadly, they seem to have stumbled with respect to successfully engaging with the development community and the result has been that Open Solaris has attracted limited amount of developer interest in participating in the Open Solaris project after three years.</p>
<p>Given the community contributor encouragement in the above post, Ingress seems to be making a similar attempt at moving from a non-organic open source project to an organic one.  I applaud your efforts in this regard, but would caution you to learn from Sun&#8217;s MySQL and Open Solaris examples.  Communities are difficult to create and require nurturing.  Perusing the Ingres issue tracking, wiki, and source control systems, it is clear that the right steps are being made but that Ingress too has quite a ways to go.</p>
<p>In that, I wish you and your talented team the best of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil Mahadev</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ingres.com/emmamcgrattan/2008/04/16/a-little-bit-closed/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil Mahadev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ingres.com/emmamcgrattan/?p=42#comment-5</guid>
		<description>The meaning of Open Source and Community is completely tarnished by the announcements being made, and from what experience I have seen with PostgreSQL, the chances of getting community code into the product is spread across various geographies and petty polytics, thus leaving developers disoriented.

INGRES ROCKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The meaning of Open Source and Community is completely tarnished by the announcements being made, and from what experience I have seen with PostgreSQL, the chances of getting community code into the product is spread across various geographies and petty polytics, thus leaving developers disoriented.</p>
<p>INGRES ROCKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deb woods</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ingres.com/emmamcgrattan/2008/04/16/a-little-bit-closed/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>deb woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ingres.com/emmamcgrattan/?p=42#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Agree completely, It is so hard to build a strong community and sad to see projects with such little regard for their community. 
http://blogs.ingres.com/tech/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree completely, It is so hard to build a strong community and sad to see projects with such little regard for their community.<br />
<a href="http://blogs.ingres.com/tech/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.ingres.com/tech/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
